The Dangers of Reading in Bed.
The Dangers of Reading in Bed. In 18th-century Europe, the practice was considered a menace to life and property, but mostly to morals.
"""
Until the 17th and 18th centuries, bringing a book to bed was a rare privilege reserved for those who knew how to read, had access to books, and had the means to be alone. The invention of the printing press transformed silent reading into a common practice—and a practice bound up with emerging conceptions of privacy. Solitary reading was so common by the 17th century, books were often stored in the bedroom instead of the parlor or the study.

Meanwhile, the bedroom was changing too. Sleeping became less sociable and more solitary. In the 16th and 17th centuries, even royals lacked the nighttime privacy contemporary sleepers take for granted. In the House of Tudor, a servant might sleep on a cot by the bed or slip under the covers with her queenly boss for warmth. By day, the bed was the center of courtly life. The monarchs designated a separate bedchamber for conducting royal business. In the morning, they would commute from their sleeping-rooms to another part of the castle, where they would climb into fancier, more lavish beds to receive visitors
[...]
18th-century distress over solitary, silent novel reading and masturbation’s new status as a public menace: “Novels, like masturbation, created for women alternative ‘companions of their pillow.’” These “solitary vices,” as Laqueur calls them, were condemned for fear that individual autonomy would lead to a breakdown in the collective moral order.

People feared that solitary reading and sleeping fostered a private, fantasy life that would threaten the collective—especially among women. The solitary sleeper falls asleep at night absorbed in fantasies of another world, a place she only knows from books. During the day, the lure of imaginative fiction might draw a woman under the covers to read, compromising her social obligations.
[...]
now bedtime reading is the object of peril rather than its supposed cause. “One must acknowledge the triumph [of] the screen,” the novelist Philip Roth told Le Monde in 2013. “I don’t remember ever in my lifetime the situation being as sad for books—with all the steady focus and uninterrupted concentration they require—as it is today. And it will be worse tomorrow and even worse the day after.”
"""
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/05/reading-in-bed/527388/
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/05/reading-in-bed/527388/

Labels: Oleg Zabluda

- posted by Oleg Zabluda @ 6:16 PM | permalink | | | technorati | bloglines | feedster

 
"""
"""
“Regarding the go match between Ke Jie and AlphaGo, no website, without exception, may carry a livestream." [...] The ban did not just cover video footage: outlets were banned from covering the match live in any way, including text commentary, social media, or push notifications.

It appears the government was concerned that 19-year-old Ke, who lost the first of three scheduled games by a razor-thin half-point margin, might have suffered a more damaging defeat that would hurt the national pride of a state which holds Go close to its heart.
[...]
DeepMind is streaming all three games of the match live, on YouTube. But the video site is blocked in China, along with the rest of Google’s services.
"""
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/24/china-censored-googles-alphago-match-against-worlds-best-go-player
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/24/china-censored-googles-alphago-match-against-worlds-best-go-player

Labels: Oleg Zabluda

- posted by Oleg Zabluda @ 5:18 PM | permalink | | | technorati | bloglines | feedster

 
No Till Farming
No Till Farming
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZeCH8jwn2k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZeCH8jwn2k

Labels: Oleg Zabluda

- posted by Oleg Zabluda @ 12:32 PM | permalink | | | technorati | bloglines | feedster